Short description of the event
On September 10, 1954, French railway worker Marius Dewilde had a close encounter with an unidentified flying object near his home in Quarouble, northern France. He reported seeing a round, metallic object land silently near the railway tracks. Two small humanoid creatures exited the vehicle before Dewilde was struck by a bright beam of light and briefly paralyzed. The object then took off and disappeared into the sky. Police and military personnel found evidence at the scene but could not explain the event.

When and where did this all happen?
The incident occurred on September 10, 1954, in Quarouble, Nord Department, France, directly on the railway tracks near the home of Marius Dewilde.

Main features of the event
Dewilde described the object as round, metallic, and about three meters wide, floating silently and emitting an intense light. Two figures about one meter tall, wearing dark, metallic suits, emerged from the object. Their faces were unrecognizable, and they moved silently. As Dewilde approached the object, he was struck by a beam of light that immobilized him for several seconds. The UFO then ascended vertically and disappeared. Indentations on the railway tracks and unusual animal behavior were observed at the scene.

Investigation and clarification attempts
The French gendarmerie investigated the site and found unusual marks on the railway tracks, as if something heavy had been standing there. The case was picked up by local newspapers and attracted considerable attention. UFO researchers also documented the incident, but were unable to locate any other direct witnesses to the landing. Skeptics put forward alternative explanations—such as hallucinations or marks left by regular machines or trains—but none of these hypotheses could completely refute the incident.

List of the most credible witnesses
Marius Dewilde was the main witness. He stuck to his story for many years and was considered credible by investigators. The French gendarmerie was also involved and documented evidence at the scene. In addition, UFO researchers and journalists contributed to publicizing the case, conducting interviews, and securing coverage.

Conclusion on credibility
The case offers clear and detailed witness testimony, as well as physical evidence at the landing site. The official investigation by the gendarmerie underscores the seriousness of the situation. However, independent witnesses or technical evidence such as photographs or radar recordings are lacking.

Credibility: Medium – A credible single witness statement with physical evidence, but no additional witnesses or definitive evidence.