The Voronezh UFO incident (1989) – One of the most mysterious UFO landings

Short description of the event
On September 27, 1989, numerous eyewitnesses reported that a large, glowing red UFO had landed in the city park of Voronezh, Soviet Union. A giant, humanoid creature with red eyes emerged from the object, accompanied by a robot-like figure. The creature reportedly caused a child to briefly disappear. The incident attracted international attention after it was reported by the Soviet news agency TASS.

When and where did this all happen?
The sighting occurred on September 27, 1989, in the city park of Voronezh, a city in the former Soviet Union (now Russia).

Main features of the event
The UFO was described as a large, oval object that glowed red and flew slowly over the city before landing in the park. After landing, a hatch opened, and a humanoid figure up to three meters tall with long limbs and red eyes emerged. It was accompanied by a smaller, robot-like creature. The large figure carried a metallic baton, which it reportedly used to make a young boy disappear briefly. Many witnesses—including schoolchildren, teachers, and adults—ran away in fear but continued to observe the events from a distance. After a few minutes, the beings disappeared back into the UFO, which then quickly took off.

Investigation and clarification attempts
The state news agency TASS officially reported on the incident. Soviet scientists, including those from the USSR Institute of Geophysics, investigated the alleged landing site. Elevated radiation levels and circular depressions in the ground were detected there. Skeptics suspected the children had fabricated a story or a mass hallucination, possibly triggered by media coverage of UFOs at the time.

List of the most credible witnesses
Among the most important witnesses were several school classes and their teachers, who claimed to have observed the incident. Other residents of Voronezh also independently reported seeing the unidentified flying object. Soviet scientists also investigated radiation levels and soil changes on site.

Conclusion on credibility
Numerous independent witness statements and documented physical evidence support the authenticity of the incident. The official reporting by TASS is particularly noteworthy. However, photographic or film evidence is lacking, and the possibility of a childishly exaggerated narrative or a psychological mass reaction remains.

Credibility: Medium – Numerous witnesses and physical evidence support the event, but definitive proof is lacking.

Available media: The report comes from the ORF and was published shortly after the incident in Voronezh was announced